Drashna wrote:StrawDragon wrote:BLAH!
I would never buy Seagate again. I am constantly replacing them. Granted they have a decent RMA procedure.. I am tired of drive failure with Seagate. Almost all my drives I bought 2 years ago have Re-certified labels on them.
If you bought them recertified....
Personally, all my drives are Seagate and I've not had to RMA for a few years. but I've had a similar experience to yours, but with WD drives. It's just the run of your luck, I guess.
Sent from my HTC One S
IMHO all this seagate vs. wd is crap/ good is a bunch of BS. i use both for many years, the RMA's for both are about the same. i have sg and wd drives running for years without probs, i have sg and wd drives i had to return as DOA or soon after.
usually i put any drive i use/ use in a clients pc to a decent 'stress test' when i get them this days. if they survive that for 48+ hrs, they are good to go (sh*t happens, but rarely).
it is really more what you need in specs for the machine and what is cheaper (not even that anymore really, it seems sg and wd have a nice understanding about keeping prices very equal this days).
so i guess personal pref. + mission based minor differences (like i go with wd for the green drives). failure rate for me, i RMA'd 2 seagates and one wd over the last 5 yrs. that is a unimportant number for each brand.
cheers, L