200+GB Users. What Hardware and OS?

Need help? Post your questions here.

Moderator: moderators

Postby dobson » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:36 pm

2,812 artists
4,416 albums
45,517 songs
316.72 GB (~ 4,920 hours)

on one 500 GB external USB drive

Mac OS X 10.4.11
1.5 GHz PowerPC G4
1 GB RAM

works like a charm... Streams beautifully. Takes a few seconds to load the left panel on the initial load (maybe 5 to 8 seconds) but I agree with flacflac regarding folder organization and load times. Mine is Artist>Album>Song, so all my 2812 artists are visible on the left.
dobson
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:10 pm

Postby Eloquence » Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:12 pm

12,085 artists
19,811 albums
227,109 songs
1701.47 GB (~ 26,431 hours)

Windows 2003 server
AMD Athlon 64 x2 4000+
3 GB RAM

Disk is a 5x500 GB Windows software raid-5 array.

No speed issues at all, but I need to give subsonic 512 MB in the settings to make it able to run - if I don't do this the front page won't even load.

Also, my music is sorted by genre dirs first (genre -> artist -> album or genre -> a-z -> artist -> album) so I don't have thousands of files in the top listing itself. That may be a source of slowdown for some.
Eloquence
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 10:55 am

Postby guitargurus » Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:30 pm

1,692 artists
2,601 albums
33,811 songs
832.98 GB (~ 12,939 hours)

Dual Quad-Core Xeon
20GB RAM
8 1TB SAS drives configured as RAID 10
VMware ESX 3.5 Host OS
Ubuntu 9.04 Guest OS (Subsonic is the only service running on the guest os)
15MB Fiber Connect (with bursts around 100MB)
The entire collection is FLAC.

Speed is great if config is changed to 512mb. I have all albums listed on the front page, no sub categories. It works great. It will load a little slow over a DSL line at times (or verizon EVDO) but otherwise it works great.

If there was CHAT feature I would be in heaven................ How about that beta!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
guitargurus
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 6:40 pm

Postby flacflac » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:06 pm

guitargurus wrote:Dual Quad-Core Xeon
20GB RAM
8 1TB SAS drives configured as RAID 10


LOL, I am *sure* that thread-starter jonathanroz is now totally relaxed about his 300 Dollar setup. ;)

Not trying to upset you but: 8TB in RAID 10 and 20GB of RAM? Subsonic would run with 1/10th of that and FAST. How come you're running such a power-hungry system? Just curious, and of course envying that RAID. ;)

ff
flacflac
 
Posts: 141
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:43 am

Postby donpearson » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:43 pm

im just waiting on my new cpu to come then my new server will be running...
raid here we come!
Facebook Group:
http://www.facebook.com/groups/subsonic.group/

Image
donpearson
 
Posts: 361
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:53 pm
Location: UK

Postby Subsonic Streamer » Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:20 am

Well, mine is close to 1TB of music, close to quarter of million, I have 2x quad core xeon (total of 8-cores) with 4GB ECC Buffered memory with RAID setup running standard SATA.

I built this server just for web hosting, FTP, and Subsonic...

However, I think Subsonic isn't design to index a music database this large. Can someone tell me a solution please? Because everytime when I search for a song, the system tells me no match, however when I manually go into the folder, the music is there, all standard mp3s.

Everyone, I need a search index that can handle my "iTune" (or Napster) like music collection! Ha-ha I can basically open a music store lol...

Napster claim they have almost over 8 million songs, and I'm catching up by programming the server to download artist album using Yahoo Music and iTunes musics store record directories, automatically...

Thanks.
Subsonic Streamer
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:05 pm

Postby mixmaster » Sat Sep 12, 2009 12:02 pm

Subsonic Streamer wrote:However, I think Subsonic isn't design to index a music database this large. Can someone tell me a solution please? Because everytime when I search for a song, the system tells me no match, however when I manually go into the folder, the music is there, all standard mp3s.


As you can see from this thread, Subsonic can definitely handle collections as big as yours. You need to build your search index, which takes quite a bit of time on collections as big as ours. Go to Settings / Search / Update Search Index Now. That's how you build the search index. I have my automatic updating turned off, which I recommend for collections of this size in general, and just update it whenever I need to.
________
Last edited by mixmaster on Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
mixmaster
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 5:30 am

Postby uannight » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:03 pm

2,173 artists
2,190 albums
12,953 songs
96.72 GB (~ 1,502 hours)

Thin Client hp t5135 fanless
Debian Squeeze
128 Mb RAM
VIA Esther processor 400MHz
500Gb External Hard Disk
uannight
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 8:50 pm

Postby colli419 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:56 pm

Ubuntu 9.10
AMD Athlon 64 2800+
2 Gb RAM
3 500MB (RAID 5)

2,779 artists
4,037 albums
43,825 songs
288.23 GB (~ 4,477 hours)
Last edited by colli419 on Wed May 05, 2010 6:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
colli419
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:23 pm

Re: 200+GB Users. What Hardware and OS?

Postby Aethies » Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:55 pm

jonathanroz wrote:OK. I know we have quite a few subsonic users with music collections over 200GB.

I tried to load a large amount of music on one of my old laptops and it pretty much laughed at me when I tried to open the home page.

Can you list out how many GBs of music you have along with your hardware setup and OS? I am thinking about building another PC for around $300 but am worried it might not be able to support a large amount of music.


It's all in the sig!
Aethies

Ubuntu Server 12.04
===================
3,281 artists
9,432 albums
113,608 songs
2636.09 GB (10,769 hours)
===================
User avatar
Aethies
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:33 pm

Postby Alsaya » Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:48 pm

709 artists
1,817 albums
20,444 songs
553.76 GB (~ 8,602 hours)

and growing, works fine
Subsonic on Server 2012, only flac
Image
Alsaya
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:46 pm

Postby Sh4gr4th » Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:15 pm

1,977 artists
4,596 albums
50,830 songs
287.87 GB (~ 4,471 hours)

Hardware
AMD X2-5000
4GB RAM
OS
Windows Home Server

Memory used by subsonic: 55MB (192MB memory limit)
Sh4gr4th
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 12:13 pm

Specs

Postby jeremyh » Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:11 pm

7,169 artists
10,147 albums
110,230 songs
601.53 GB (~ 9,344 hours)

Hardware
Dell PowerEdge 830
64bit Dual Core Pentium 4 2.8GHz
2.5 GB 533Mhz Memory (2x1GB, 2x256MB)
750GB (4x250GB Hard drives in RAID 5, EXT3 format)

Software
Ubuntu 9.10
Apache Tomcat/6.0.20, java 1.6.0_16

Works well, little time (20sec) to load left pane initially, but then it is quick with caching. Have Artist>Album>[TrackNo]-[Song] layout.
jeremyh
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 12:01 am
Location: Westminster, Colorado, United States

Postby karaya1 » Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:20 pm

Pentium PIV 2,6 Ghz
1GB RAM

BS Windows XP


nearly 170000 Songs with 1450 GB
karaya1
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:15 pm

Re: 200+GB Users. What Hardware and OS?

Postby Vproduct » Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:23 pm

jonathanroz wrote:OK. I know we have quite a few subsonic users with music collections over 200GB.


9 805 Àðòèñòîâ
23 349 Àëüáîìîâ
293 715 Ïåñåí
1940,71 GB (~ 30 147 ÷àñîâ)

Windows 7
Subsonic 3.9 beta 1
Athlon x2 5600+
RAM 3 gb
HDD 2x1,5tb
User avatar
Vproduct
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:05 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests